Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:57

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Man eats dubious street food—ends up blowing apart his GI tract - Ars Technica
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
A 'Crazy Idea' About Pluto Was Just Confirmed in a Scientific First - ScienceAlert
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Doctors Find They Can Detect Cancer in Blood Years Before Diagnosis - futurism.com
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Telescope Captures First-Ever Ultra-Fine Magnetic Stripes on the Sun’s Surface! - The Daily Galaxy
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
The Aging Brain: 6 Things You Should Be Doing to Slow Cognitive Decline - CNET